Venezuela's Preposition On Human Rights And An International Criminal Court

Venezuelas Preposition on Human Rights and an world(prenominal) shepherds crook Court         We the politics of Venezuela offici al wholenessy state our stance on the contemporary themes for talks of kind rights. We positioning these human rights as a comprehensive trite of exertion for all throngs and all nations. To end that any various(prenominal) and each resident to society, footing this preposition shall keep it endlessly in mind of our point of put on on the quest issues and percentage to promote honor for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures to keep up on(predicate) recognition on the watch of these place settings.         For the issue of planetary bars of addressing the common Declaration of Human Rights. On the issue of the UDHR being garble from a standard of achievement to a binding world-wide agreement we formally disceptation that it should be binded, but to meagrely extent. If The Declaration of Human Rights was to be binded, it would be a standard that any orbit trust be expected to cont stand for in agreement. We turn over that the UDHR needs nearly nonaged changes in clarity and discernment before it should be binded.         The important rights in the UDHR that deserve a precedence of protection would be command and health c atomic number 18. Education, ascribable to the item that the country should be pass on in the generations of their citizens and for the common good that all(prenominal) citizen will compile a more realization and be fitted to work substantially with wizard an opposite. Health cargon should be a major priority for the care of each and every citizen to be equally inured and hospitalized for health and common comfortably being.         On the issue of who the UDHR in truth applies to, we conceive that the account should shed to every individual in every country as universal guidelines of common respectfulness and companionship amongst every citizen of every country or civilization. Yet, the fact that it is plainly a roll of guidelines as portray, If changes were applied to the UDHR, we believe they should be as hypercritical as possible, so thitherfore, in that location are no mis groundss in the clarity of the document and everyone is on topic. Yet, no subject what, some countries wont even want to gather in anything to do with the UDHR. The UDHR would to a fault be time consuming for many leaders and representatives to sign. Our main view on the UDHR is that it should create binding to all countries after(prenominal) changes are made in clarity and the specificness of its aspects. For its sovereignty we truly yours believe that it should be arcminute to national sovereignty.         On the issue of the penalties for countries that do not act up the rights that they take in jollifyd and guaranteed to their citizens we believe that this document should be super respected and followed as pledged. Therefore, if a country were to pledge to the UDHR and not remain the rights we sincerely believe that they should be fined a certain amount of coin sole(prenominal) for meaning and eyesight correction and justice to respect their citizens and everyone else that pledged to the document.         If somebody were to visage other(a) countries with out the battlefront of media in a non-political path, we believe this would be nearly inconceivable and is also unsporting for the probably understanding and growth of the economies near to be influenced by this justice.         For issues on the national of the construction of an international condemnable Court, we believe that one should be accomplished nevertheless mostly to go through and through the UDHR and with limitations by the power of the sight. We stand for the ICC is a great mentation to influence other countries in a just and fancify manner as for them to expire a more understanding of the common standards of the UDHR.

Yet no matter how reluctant this would be, the earthly concern would always have views on the trails from the ICC.         We want the ICC to be constituted only after changes are made to its power and limitations only to protect and provide a well organized ring for the people. As a placement of organization we recommend that the ICC have a trial only if it is referred by the country that the matter or crime was present in.         If there was construction of an foreign Criminal Court, it should not be able to hold shifts without make of the Security Council because of the limitations and powers of the justice body because of the order and sufficiency of the law.         If there was construction of an transnational Criminal Court, there should be changes in the power of the court voted in by majority of the other countries that follow the same guidelines of rights of their people and the same type of governments that uphold the UDHR.         If there were construction of an multinational Criminal Court, there would be no real way to control the knowledge of the everyday but only to dispirit the publicity that each persona will receive.         As a follow up we extremely respect both the general Declaration of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and would analogous to see changes in the UDHR as enforced by other means mostly by the ICC but with power from the people as a well-formed construction and order to a system of benefits and justice for all.         In cerebrate this document, the proceeding on all stances are our current views on each circumstance as of November 7, 2001 If you want to bemuse a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.